Portfolio 20 · physical and reporting boundaries

AI energy and carbon scenario calculator

Start from measured active and idle power, preserve duty cycle, apply facility PUE once, and report location-based and market-based Scope 2 results side by side with uncertainty and service-unit intensity.

Decision this answers: How much IT and facility energy does the workload use, what is its location-based footprint, and how does a separately sourced market-based claim compare?

Scenario

Numeric scenario inputs

Whole workload boundary, not accelerator TDP alone.

measured[3]

Infrastructure still powered outside active work.

measured[3]

Measured hours inside the reporting period.

measured[3]

Separate from active time so idle energy cannot disappear.

measured[3]

Applied once to IT energy; must be at least 1.

measured[4]

2024 Google Cloud us-central1 location-based grid factor.

published list[2]

Contractual instrument factor, reported separately from location-based emissions.

measured[1]

The complete default scenario is server rendered. Interactions stay in this browser.

Decision summary

IT energy

4032.00 kWhmeasured

Active plus idle workload energy before facility overhead.

[3]

Facility energy

4838.40 kWhexact-derived

IT energy multiplied by measured PUE exactly once.

[4]

Location-based emissions

1998.26 kgCO2epublished list

Published grid factor; uncertainty range 1599–2498 kgCO2e.

[2][1]

Market-based emissions

241.92 kgCO2emeasured

Separate contractual-method result; never subtracted from the physical result.

[1]
Direct-labeled result profile

The tables below are the accessible source of truth; bar lengths never carry identity alone.

Energy and emissions ledger

Energy and emissions ledger
CandidateQuantityDefaultEvidence boundaryReporting treatmentEvidence
Active IT energyPower × active hours4032 kWhMeasured whole-system powerPhysical energymeasured[3]
Idle IT energyPower × idle hours0 kWhMeasured whole-system powerPhysical energymeasured[3]
Facility overheadIT × PUE806 kWhMeasured facility ratioApplied onceexact-derived[4]
Location-based Scope 2Facility × grid factor1998 kgCO2ePublished regional factorReported separatelypublished list[2][1]
Market-based Scope 2Facility × instrument factor242 kgCO2eContract-specific factorReported separatelymeasured[1]

Service-unit intensity

Service-unit intensity
CandidateNumeratorDenominatorDefaultClaim boundaryEvidence
Energy per requestFacility kWh36 million requests0.000134 kWh/requestNo avoided-energy claimexact-derived[3]
Location emissions per requestLocation kgCO2e36 million requests0.000056 kgCO2e/requestNo offset subtractionexact-derived[1]

Official surface versus this site

This offline workbench

The protocol defines the reporting methods. This page traces workload power and duty-cycle evidence through PUE and grid factors, refuses unknown required inputs, and exposes absolute and per-service-unit results without claiming avoided emissions.

Sources and methodology

Every result-affecting reference is visible here without JavaScript and is retained in the JSON export.

[1] Scope 2 Guidance
Authority
GHG Protocol
Native identifier
GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance
Unit
location- and market-based kgCO2e
Evidence
exact-derived
As of
2026-08-01
Retrieved
2026-08-01
Freshness
reference
Normalization
The two reporting methods are calculated and shown independently; contractual claims never erase location-based emissions.

Open the authoritative source

[2] Google Cloud region carbon data
Authority
Google Cloud
Native identifier
us-central1 2024 grid carbon intensity
Unit
gCO2e/kWh
Evidence
published list
As of
2026-08-01
Retrieved
2026-08-01
Freshness
reference
Normalization
The published 2024 us-central1 grid intensity is used as an editable location-based scenario factor.

Open the authoritative source

[3] MLPerf Power Measurement
Authority
MLCommons
Native identifier
MLPerf Power
Unit
watts and energy
Evidence
measured
As of
2026-08-01
Retrieved
2026-08-01
Freshness
reference
Normalization
Use compatible whole-system measurement; accelerator TDP is not silently substituted for workload power.

Open the authoritative source

[4] Power usage effectiveness
Authority
The Green Grid
Native identifier
PUE metric
Unit
facility energy / IT energy
Evidence
measured
As of
2026-08-01
Retrieved
2026-08-01
Freshness
reference
Normalization
PUE is explicit, evidence-bearing, and applied exactly once.

Open the authoritative source

Limits and non-claims

  • Unknown required power, PUE, or location intensity fails closed; zero is a valid measurement only when explicitly supplied.
  • Embodied carbon, water, refrigerants, and Scope 3 are out of this operational Scope 2 scenario and must not be inferred from it.
  • No offset, renewable-energy certificate, or avoided-emissions claim is subtracted from physical energy or location-based emissions.